ERAS Cardiac logo

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Prevention

Content Type: Protocols | Provider

Created: June 28, 2021
Contributor(s): Heather Kooiker • Mike Modrow, PA-C • ERAS Cardiac Collaborative Network
Editor(s): Cheryl Crisafi, MSN, RN, CNL • Amanda Rea, DNP, CRNP, AGACNP-BC, CCRN, CMC, CSC, E-AEC • Gina McConnell, RN, BSN, CCRN • Shannon Crotwell, RN, BSN, CCRN • Alexander Gregory, MD, FRCPC
baxter sponsor logo
Sponsor

Summary

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after cardiac surgery can significantly impact patient recovery and strain the healthcare system. For patients, SSIs bring physical, emotional, and financial burdens. For hospitals, they contribute to increased costs, resource demands, and potential reputational damage. Preventive strategies, early detection, and timely management are essential to reduce complications and improve outcomes.

Please note, logging in as a provider is required to access additional information. Click here to register for free site access or click here to login as a provider.

AI Assistance Statement

This summary was developed with assistance from artificial intelligence and reviewed, edited, and approved by the listed editor(s). Reference: OpenAI (2025). ChatGPT (November version) [Large language model]. 
https://chat.openai.com

ERAS Cardiac VEC Disclaimer

The Virtual Education Center (VEC) and all included content are intended to inform ERAS Cardiac Members on a wide range of topics related to enhanced recovery. The information presented has been provided by enhanced recovery experts and is for educational purposes only.

It is not intended to describe, recommend, or suggest any specific medical practice or intervention, nor should it be considered formal medical advice or consultation. The ERAS Cardiac Society cannot guarantee that the information provided is accurate or complete in every respect. Therefore, the Society is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or clinical outcomes resulting from application of the information obtained through the VEC.

All healthcare professionals should continue to exercise sound clinical judgment and base therapeutic decisions on the best available evidence and patient specific factors.

Educational materials produced by the Society for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS Cardiac) may be considered Open Access. Non commercial use of ERAS Cardiac educational materials, including images, audio, and video, in whole or in part, is permitted with the following conditions:

  • The content is not altered
  • The listed authors of the content and ERAS Cardiac are appropriately referenced, and
  • A URL address or hyperlink to the original material or the main web site [https://www.erascardiac.org/] is included in the reproduction

For questions or comments about the ERAS Cardiac VEC, please contact us.

References

  1. TannerJ, NorrieP, MelenK. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD004122.
  2. BanKA, MineiJP, LarongaC, et al. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(1):59-74.
  3. Bode LG, Kluytmans JA, Wertheim HF, et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(1):9-17.
  4. Paling FP, Olsen K, Ohneberg K, et al.Risk prediction for Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection following cardiothoracic surgery: a secondary analysis of the V710-P003 trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193445.
  5. Cimochowski GE, Harostock MD, Brown R, Bernardi M, Alonzo N, Coyle K. Intranasal mupirocin reduces sternal wound infection after open heart surgery in diabetics and nondiabetics. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(5):1572-1578.
  6. Edwards FH, Engelman RM, Houck P, Shahian DM, Bridges CR; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part I: duration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(1):397-404.
  7. Engelman R, Shahian D, Shemin R,eta l; Workforce on Evidence-Based Medicine, Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: antibiotic choice. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1569-1576.
  8. Lazar HL, Chipkin SR, Fitzgerald CA, Bao Y, Cabral H, Apstein CS. Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events. Circulation. 2004;109 (12):1497-1502.
  9. Chaney MA, Nikolov MP, Blakeman BP, Bakhos M. Attempting to maintain normoglycemia during cardiopulmonary bypass with insulin may initiate postoperative hypoglycemia. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(5):1091-1095.
  10. Gandhi GY, Nuttall GA, Abel MD, et al. Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4): 233-243.
  11. KaralapillaiD,StoryD,HartGK,etal. Postoperative hypothermia and patient outcomes after elective cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66 (9):780-784.
  12. Lavallée JF, Gray TA, Dumville J, Russell W, Cullum N. The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):142.
  13. Mutters NT, De Angelis G, Restuccia G, et al. Use of evidence-based recommendations in an antibiotic care bundle for the intensive care unit. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(1):65-70.
  14. Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S. Prevention and management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152(4):962-972.
  15. Keenan JE, Speicher PJ, Thacker JK, Walter M, Kuchibhatla M, Mantyh CR. The preventive surgical site infection bundle in colorectal surgery: an effective approach to surgical site infection reduction and health care cost savings. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(10):1045-1052.